Paul Delaney, former senior editor at the New York Times:
"He was not a good journalist at the beginning, but he grew into a great publisher. He headed the paper at the start of its most turbulent period. For blacks, that included the efforts to integrate the operation, the newsroom, in particular, the company's heart and soul. Punch was known to allow editors and managers to run their departments. That meant the all-whites in charge could continue in their old ways, hiring and promoting those who mirrored themselves. I always thought he let Executive Editor Abe Rosenthal bully him, especially regarding minority hiring and promotion. Abe moved with deliberately slow speed.
"A minority lawsuit filed in 1971 was settled nine years later. Punch allowed his lawyers to fight the suit to eventual agreement. I always thought he was embarrassed by it, that it sullied the Times' reputation, and he was right. Afterwards, I was on a committee he appointed with the purpose of implementing the agreement. (It called for hiring, promotions, training, and assigning blacks to all major beats.) I was pleased that Punch told us to continue enforcing the agreement after the expiration date. But, again, he didn't put muscle behind it and let his managers remain in charge & change was as slow as ever. Well, not really, things began to move faster than they had, and I credit him and his son, Arthur Jr.
"Regarding another matter, I was in the Washington bureau when Punch announced to us at a party that he'd hired William Safire as columnist. Along with most others in the office (I was the sole black reporter for years), I was furious and we all let him know. My fury extended beyond the fact that Safire was conservative, but that there were no black editors on the paper and that Safire represented the real truth that it would be a long time before the paper really changed. At that time, Safire was an example that the paper would open up even for conservatives, but not nonwhites."
C. Gerald Fraser, former Times reporter and cultural columnist:
"I have always had conflicts with uniformed authorities and this includes New York Times's security guards who, among other things, especially in the late 1960s, always demanded to see my Times ID. Of course, I resisted. I had worked at The Times for quite some time when, one morning the publisher, Arthur 'Punch' Sulzberger, and I had entered the building, more or less together. He approached the security guards first, took out his Times ID, and held it in his open palm for the guards to see. I imagined then that he was trying to tell me, coming in behind him, 'It's no big deal, Gerald, even I, the publisher . . .' I laughed to myself.
"Sulzberger was everything they say about his being low-keyed and a gentleman. He greeted all level of employees by name. He had so much power in New York and I never saw or heard of him using it inappropriately.
"Charles Brown, the longtime newsroom receptionist, told me today that soon after Punch took over the publisher's job, he made life better for the Times's black porters. Previously, they ate their lunch in the men's room and they also changed clothes there after finishing their shifts. Punch had a recreation room and showers installed.
"Two anti-discrimination class action suits occurred during Sulzberger's reign. His obituary, which I have read only online, referred in passing to the women's class action anti-discrimination suit, but never mentioned the minorities's suit. . . . During 'our' suit, I never heard Sulzberger's name mentioned in connection with any of the negotiations."
Reginald Stuart, McClatchy Co. corporate recruiter, former Times reporter:
"Punch had class and a real appreciation for the important role serious newspapers play in society.
"He stuck by serious journalism in the face of all kinds of darts and arrows, even when the paper's fortunes were at a low point in the mid-1970's. When the paper was taken to court over its affirmative action practices with respect to women and people of color, he maintained his respect once the battles ended. He was a tough business executive with a real appreciation for news. I think publishing a great paper was foremost in his mind. He knew if he did, the profits would follow. For years they did."
Roger Wilkins, former editorial writer at the Times and Washington Post:
"Arthur Ochs Sulzberger was a real gentleman with a powerful determination to preserve and improve the enormous gem that he inherited. You could call him 'Punch' — a childhood family nickname, I believe, but when you brought him a tough issue, he could become a very steely gentleman who was determined to preserve and enhance that gem.
"I recall that when he first hired a black member for the Editorial Board (me), he invited me to his office and spend almost an hour with me alone and then brought in some of his favorite Times journalists to let them know that he intended for this move to be successful. It was gentlemanly and it was clear.....he expected this to work and the people he had brought in to meet me were to make sure that this would work out.
"As time wore on, I realized I had a very smart boss who was clear in his mind about what good journalism was and the quality expected in his paper every morning. He understood life in America. And as I worked, I realized that he had made sure that everybody needed to know that this step in integrating this part of his family inheritance was going to work. He was a good man — fair and determined that the great institution that had been handed would grow and maintain the high values of that institution.
"Punch was a very good man devoted to his work and to the people who he had brought in to help him achieve that goal.
"In all, he was one SWELL boss and a very good guy."